> Have you any IO operations? As result you have dependence of page > size.
Though your performance most probably will not depend on these operations because they will be executed at some random times by OS. And they will be collected to have multiple blocks in one operation anyway... I don't have good knowledge of how disk cache works in kernel to say if it will be beneficiary to send data there in chunks equal to blocks on disk as opposed to chunks of any arbitrary size... Pavel On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Alexey Pechnikov <pechni...@mobigroup.ru> wrote: > Hello! > > On Monday 21 September 2009 23:11:57 Pavel Ivanov wrote: >> > Most modern FS have the same block size. >> >> Though I don't think that in case of synchronous = OFF there's any >> benefit of using pages of the exactly same size as block in file >> system. Correct me if I'm wrong. > > Have you any IO operations? As result you have dependence of page > size. > > Best regards, Alexey Pechnikov. > http://pechnikov.tel/ > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
