On 7 Oct 2009, at 8:33pm, John Elrick wrote: > Isn't this a variation of the DVCS problem? In other words, would it > be correct in saying that the underlying issue is treating this as a > database problem, rather than it being a versioning problem which > happens to involve a database?
Yes yes yes. And look how complicated the programming is to do DVCS correctly. And now the problem is ... What is the resolution of your versioning ? Do put a version number on each row, or do you consider each column in each row to need its own version number ? What if one site changes one column and another changes another column of the same row ? How many version numbers do you want to store for just one table ? Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users