Hello! On Monday 07 December 2009 22:29:47 Igor Tandetnik wrote: > What do you mean by "SQLite stores" the BOM? Are you saying that you are > passing in a string without the BOM, and SQLite spontaneoulsy manufactures > one? Double-check your application - I suspect you'll find that you are > actually passing strings with BOM to SQLite to begin with, and it just stores > them faithfully.
Yes, the BOM is on the original string. But with ICU collation we can see that 17 symbols string is equal to 16 symbols string. I think this result is not right. May be automatically dropping the BOM for ICU collated fields is more correct way. Best regards, Alexey Pechnikov. http://pechnikov.tel/ _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
