>From: Jens Miltner <j...@mac.com>
>Sent: Wed, February 3, 2010 9:46:06 AM
>Just another thought to consider: depending on the amount of non-ASCII
>(or non-roman) string data stored in your database, in may be more
>efficient to use UTF-8 encoding rather than UTF-16 encoding:
>UTF-8 takes up less space for ASCII or roman text, whereas it may take
>up more space for other characters. This really depends on the mix.
Thank you for your suggestions!. I will go with UTF-8 encoding.
Regards,
Samuel
__________________________________________________________________
Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer® 8.
Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for Free! at
http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
