On 2 Jun 2010, at 10:12am, Dan Kennedy wrote: > The fix you propose would ignore the (suspected) corruption > and continue without reporting it to the user. Which might be > the best thing for some
but not for me. Please do not roll anything like that into the source. I definitely want error messages if there's even the slightest hint that my database is corrupt. What I would like to know is why the PRAGMA check shows no corruption in that database. Perhaps it could be revised to do so. Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
