On 7 June 2010 20:08, George Georgalis <geo...@galis.org> wrote: > On Mon 07 Jun 2010 at 05:07:43 PM +0200, Kees Nuyt wrote: >> >>That could be implemented as an appication with a set of >>virtual tables, backed by the readdir() and stat() system >>calls. >>I haven't heard of any implementation, although fossil >>http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/tip/www/index.wiki >>has a few routines which might be interesting. > > Interesting approach. I've never heard of virtual tables. > Unfortunately, I don't know anything about the backend of > generating indices or optimizing db queries either. But I > see what you are getting at, maybe I can work it out. > [snip]
Apologies if I'm misunderstanding you here, but are you interested in a unified fs/database type affair, similar to what Microsoft attempted (and failed at) with WinFS? The Be Filesystem and this interview with it's developers may be of interest:- http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/03/29/windows_on_a_database_sliced/ http://www.letterp.com/~dbg/practical-file-system-design.pdf Cheers, Ian _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
