On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Stephen Oberholtzer < oliverkloz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2. They contain only a subset of the columns in the main table, so > they are smaller -- so reading through the entire index is faster than > reading through the entire table. > > Stephen, are you telling that is' smaller in any situation? When I mentioned the trigger in case of fast reading of rowid/id, I thought that in this case there can be a separated table with sing field id (rowid) that should change its contents synchronously to the main table that contains all data. I suppose in this case the two variants (index vs trigger) is on par in terms of the size or am I wrong? Max _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
