On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Ruslan Mullakhmetov < r.mullakhme...@tools4brokers.com> wrote:
> > Understand this: Any programming language that is built around threads > is > > inherently broken and should be avoided. (I will not name names - you > know > > the languages I'm talking about.) And any operating system that depends > > upon threads for performance is equality busted and should also be > shunned. > > so you advise to change language? to some functional or logic? i got no > more > idea how to avoid threads and evils connected with them. > > unfortunately i'm not free in language choosing cause i develop extensions > which has api in language that "is inherently broken and should be > avoided". > I recognize this sad reality, which is why SQLite is "threadsafe" even though we actively discourage the use of threads. Sometimes you just have no choice. Unchangeable external constraints impose a programming language or platform on you. And for those occasions, you just have to VERY VERY CAREFUL. > > > _______________________________________________ > > sqlite-users mailing list > > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
