On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Tito Ciuro <tci...@mac.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Sounds like sqlite3_get_table() would take less time to access the storage > subsystem as opposed to sqlite_step() with multiple roundtrips, at the > expense of using lots more RAM, of course. So assuming RAM wasn't an issue, > why not use sqlite3_get_table()? Why is its usage being discouraged? > > > Tito, looking at the sources... sqlite3_get_table seems to be sqlite3_exec call with a callback and sqlite3_exec is sqlite3_prepare/sqlite3_step wrapper. So, probably no special access or performance boost
Max Vlasov _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
