Hi, Thanks for the quick answer.
> Presumably each thread has its own db handle. True. > You could enable shared-cache mode (although that gives you table-level > locking, not the MVCC WAL provides). That is not good enough for me, since I want to run checkpoint in a background thread, while reading/writing from the main thread (as it is now). > The alternative is to create your own VFS that stores the WAL index in > heap memory. I guess I have to do it, but I think this should be available in sqlite, since it is a common case to use sqlite from single process (but multithreaded), and using WAL index in memory will improve system performance. Yoni. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
