Thanks Pavel, I consider my case closed though any thought is welcomed! On 02/03/2011 05:53 PM, Pavel Ivanov wrote: > It seems that this explanation as well as all other statements in the > thread you linked are coming from the wrong assumption that SQLite's > handles cannot be used from any thread other than the one created that > handle. Although this was true in some earlier versions of SQLite it's > not true in the current version. So if SQLite is compiled with > THREADSAFE=1 (as mentioned in that thread) then you can do with it > whatever you want. Just beware of possible data races and potentially > uncommitted transactions because of some open statement handles. And > if as you say there's no simultaneous access to the database from > different threads then there's no difference in your usage pattern > from single-threaded one.
-- _________________________________________________________________________ The purpose of man is to know his Maker Be known by his Maker And make his Maker known So that others may know his Maker as their Maker(Emeal Zwayne) _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
