Switching to a "single format" greatly simplified things from an "administrative" point of view - giving us a consistent single "packaging" format across all platforms (Windows, Mono, Compact, ARM, etc.) - a support customer even specifically pointed out this made things much easier for them as well.
However, cases like yours, and cases where inexperienced users didn't catch some of the subtleties of the packaging change, are causing us to rethink this. We're currently discussing whether to revert back to offering a "mixed-mode" DLL in addition to the current packages. Thanks for you input. -Shane On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Michael Yeaney <michael.yea...@gmail.com>wrote: > For the 1.0.72.0 (3.7.6+) package (x64), is there a stand-alone (mixed > mode) DLL offered anymore that does not require the interop library > (much like the 1.0.66.0 version? I'm using SQLite successfully in a > few Microsoft Azure deployments, but with the new version, the servers > are not able to locate the "SQLite.Interop.dll" library, as it is not > in any search paths on the cloud machines. The goal here is simple > xcopy deployment (in other words _not_ requiring GAC registration). > > Ideas? I'm assuming I'm missing something...but I just can't find it. > > Many thanks! > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
