On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote:
> On 28 Jun 2011, at 5:34pm, Jan Hudec wrote: > > Let me express very, very strong disagreement with that. In Linux you > should > > *always* use system sqlite and specify minimal required version as > desired.... > > This works only if you have some idea what your users will be running. > Linux > You're both very right, and might i suggest a compromise: in my latest sqlite3-using project i structured the build so that if sqlite3.[ch] are found in the build tree, that sqlite3 is used, otherwise we use whatever's on the system. i did that because when i launched my project on my web hoster i found that i couldn't compile there because they have an ancient (3.3?) sqlite3. So i added the option to add your own amalgamation to my tree. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
