>  > Yes. What's wrong with that?
>
> Nothing at all - I just needed to know whether that was the case so I
> could design certain sections of my code accordingly.

Three question marks of yours suggested me that you think it's awfully wrong.

Note that although your function and application pointer will be
shared by all threads SQLite (or in some cases you) will guarantee
that this function won't be called simultaneously from different
threads for this connection. So you need to introduce some additional
thread-safety only if you use the same function and same application
pointer for different simultaneous connections.


Pavel


On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Technology Lighthouse
<tlho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Yes. What's wrong with that?
>
> Nothing at all - I just needed to know whether that was the case so I
> could design certain sections of my code accordingly.
>
> Thanks for the help!
> --
> Paul Roberts
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to