Yes I know (although I only got a 200k difference), but -O3 is about twice as fast in my tests.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Baruch Burstein <bmburst...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > I assume this is the same for sqlite3.dll or sqlite3.lib, but if not, I > am > > interested in sqlite3.o (mingw32). > > How can I minimize the size of the library (compiling with -O3, since > speed > > is my top concern, so different optimizations is not an option)? If I > know > > > > Coincidentally, i just tried -O3 and the end result was almost 0.5MB larger > than with -g -Os. > > -- > ----- stephan beal > http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
