WHERE or HAVING clauses that refer back to named results could be a
problem with the simple replacement.
SELECT a,b,a+b AS ab FROM t WHERE ab>10
Igor's suggestion work there too.
--David Garfield
Simon Slavin writes:
> I'm trying to write some code which has to be useful under many different
> circumstances. Something I want to be able to do is to take an arbitrary
> SELECT statement and replace the columns which would normally be returned
> with COUNT(*) to find out how many rows would be returned. To do this I
> replace the text between "SELECT" and "FROM".
>
> I suspect this won't work well with unusual SELECTs which include
> sub-selects. That's okay.
>
> I'm trying to get my head around whether JOINs could be a problem.
>
> Also, does anyone know whether some combination of NULs might make COUNT(*)
> give the wrong result ?
>
> And anything else relevant anyone wants to mention is fine too.
>
> Simon.
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
