On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:08 AM, John Elrick <john.elr...@fenestra.com>wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, John Elrick <john.elr...@fenestra.com >> >wrote: >> > >> >> I will have to get back to you on this. While running tests against >> >> isolated queries, I noticed an unusual circumstance. When I isolate >> >> the queries into a test program, running through our present >> >> libraries, 3.7.9 is roughly 4 times faster executing the exact same >> >> queries where it is running roughly 5 times slower in the context of >> >> the application. As those queries do not execute in the same order, I >> >> suspect that page swapping and caching issues may be involved. I'm >> >> proceeding on that assumption. >> >> >> > >> > >> > Are you using the same compile-time options when building your >> application >> > as were used when building the shell program? >> >> Yes. >> > > Have you run "SELECT sqlite_source_id();" to verify that your build is > really picking up the version of SQLite that you think it is? > > Do you have code like this in your application: > > assert( sqlite3_libversion_number()==SQLITE_VERSION_NUMBER ); > assert( strcmp(sqlite3_sourceid(),SQLITE_SOURCE_ID)==0 ); > assert( strcmp(sqlite3_libversion(),SQLITE_VERSION)==0 ); > > To verify that your SQLite source code and "sqlite3.h" header file match?
Nope. I assume that the resulting .OBJ files are self contained. I'll run the tests you suggest just to make certain. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
