Good evening, I find that if I insert,  #define _KERNEL32_ , at line 587 of 
the latest 3.7.11 sqlite3.c file. Then, the following warning message   
disappears from Microsoft Visual Studio C++ 2008 output -- warning C4232: 
nonstandard extension used : 'pCurrent' : address of dllimport 
'AreFileApisANSI' is not static, identity not guaranteed.
     Please advise me if this change is okay for Windows sqlite3.c 
applications. Thank you.

 
> e:\users\frank\dqt_memorymap\sqlite\sqlite3.c(32329) : warning C4232: 
> nonstandard extension used : 'pCurrent' : address of dllimport 
> >'AreFileApisANSI' is not static, identity not guaranteed
 
>A quick google shows http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/9a1sy630.aspx
 
>Would using /Ze instead of /Za do what you want?
 
>Regards,
>Simon

 

> From: sqlite-users-requ...@sqlite.org
> Subject: sqlite-users Digest, Vol 52, Issue 23
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:00:02 -0400
> 
> Send sqlite-users mailing list submissions to
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sqlite-users-requ...@sqlite.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sqlite-users-ow...@sqlite.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of sqlite-users digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
> 1. Re: Permissions (Steinar Midtskogen)
> 2. Re: Permissions (Steinar Midtskogen)
> 3. Re: Permissions (Richard Hipp)
> 4. Re: Permissions (Simon Slavin)
> 5. free list performance (Max Vlasov)
> 6. help (????????? ?????)
> 7. Re: help (Simon Davies)
> 8. Re: Permissions (Steinar Midtskogen)
> 9. help (????????? ?????)
> 10. Help (????????? ?????)
> 11. Help (????????? ?????)
> 12. Re: Help (niXman)
> 13. Re: free list performance (Simon Slavin)
> 14. Re: free list performance (Ghislain Segers)
> 15. Memory Usage/ Drawbacks of Statements (Mohit Sindhwani)
> 16. Is it possible to preclude the latest sqlite 3.7.11 Windows
> warning message? (Frank Chang)
> 17. Re: help (Pavel Ivanov)
> 18. Re: Memory Usage/ Drawbacks of Statements (Pavel Ivanov)
> 19. Re: Is it possible to preclude the latest sqlite 3.7.11
> Windows warning message? (Simon Davies)
> 20. Re: free list performance (Max Vlasov)
> 21. Re: free list performance (Simon Slavin)
> 22. Re: free list performance (Pavel Ivanov)
> 23. Re: Memory Usage/ Drawbacks of Statements (Mohit Sindhwani)
> 24. error 404 (Adam DeVita)
> 25. Is it possible to preclude the latest sqlite 3.7.11 Windows
> warning message? (Frank Chang)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:26:50 +0200
> From: Steinar Midtskogen <stei...@latinitas.org>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Permissions
> Message-ID: <87397vlol1....@latinitas.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> writes:
> 
> > Try the sticky bit:
> >
> > chown user:apache theDir
> > chmod 4775 theDir
> 
> I think the effect of that only is to restrict anyone but root or the
> owner of a file from deleting or renaming an otherwise writeable file
> in that directory.
> 
> -- 
> Steinar
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:40:12 +0200
> From: Steinar Midtskogen <stei...@latinitas.org>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Permissions
> Message-ID: <87y5pnk9eb....@latinitas.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
> 
> [Simon Slavin]
> 
> > The solution I came up with is that the database file owner also
> > uses Apache to look at it: I use web-facing database administration
> > software rather than opening the database in another application.
> > (I wrote a simple one myself in PHP and JavaScript.) However this
> > is unacceptable for some users.
> 
> That gave me an idea, which should solve the problem for me. Only two
> applications access the database: apache or the sqlite3 commandline
> tool. So I simply chowned the sqlite3 application and made it setuid
> apache.
> 
> It doesn't solve the general case, though, where any application owned
> by any user in a certain group should be able to access the database.
> 
> > You're using WAL mode. DELETE mode is the default behaviour: when
> > the last connection to the database is closed, the journal is
> > deleted. But you can change this to TRUNCATE or some other value
> > that suits you. That way, the files will not have to be remade. So
> > then you would ?
> 
> I chose WAL since I'd like to have as much concurrency as possible.
> 
> If TRUNCATE means that the files will always be present, never
> deleted, then I suppose that also could solve my problem, since the
> file then could be made group writeable.
> 
> 
> Any reason why sqlite doesn't use the same file permissions as the
> database file when creating these extra files? 
> -- 
> Steinar
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:02:16 -0400
> From: Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Permissions
> Message-ID:
> <CALwJ=MwA089JGMqbs1=5UWCDvTLbGq+efa=ri+w+7d2_dxp...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Steinar Midtskogen
> <stei...@latinitas.org>wrote:
> 
> >
> > Any reason why sqlite doesn't use the same file permissions as the
> > database file when creating these extra files?
> >
> >
> There was a change in version 3.7.11 to do exactly that.
> http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/84b324606a
> 
> -- 
> D. Richard Hipp
> d...@sqlite.org
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 18:36:44 +0100
> From: Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Permissions
> Message-ID: <6b2429fa-517c-4fea-abf7-86cbf8f27...@bigfraud.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> 
> On 22 Apr 2012, at 6:02pm, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> 
> > There was a change in version 3.7.11 to do exactly that.
> > http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/84b324606a
> 
> Woo hoo.
> 
> Simon.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:15:37 +0400
> From: Max Vlasov <max.vla...@gmail.com>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: [sqlite] free list performance
> Message-ID:
> <CAJtDhuCbHDok1mN+j6ufLSjSFg=mmpczrgtfjqgy4-k58dt...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Some time ago I worked with a database repeating the same sequence of
> actions multiply times. They're basically:
> - create table
> - populate table
> - do some deletes with some criteria
> - drop table
> 
> After about 20 times I started to notice the usual effects of internal
> fragmentation (slowness in some usually quick operations and reports
> of large seek from VFS). I assume this has something to do with the
> way new pages allocated from free list. I narrowed it to a little test
> that can reproduce this (tested with 3.7.10)
> 
> CREATE TABLE [TestTable] ([Id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT)
> Insert into TestTable Default Values /* do this 1,000,000 times */
> Delete from TestTable where (Id/1000) % 2 = 0
> Drop table TestTable
> 
> This test makes the db very fragmented after about 10 steps.
> 
> I thought recently that the main source of internal fragmentation is
> the nature of the data added. But looks like not only. Even if your
> data is sequential, but the free_list is fragmented, then you would
> probably get fragmented internal data. Is it possible to automatically
> sort free_list from time to time? Or maybe some other solution if this
> would cost too much?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Max
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:30:11 +0400
> From: ????????? ????? <kofa_...@mail.ru>
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: [sqlite] help
> Message-ID: <e1smgx6-0007ug-05.kofa_yox-mail...@f262.mail.ru>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> Hello,support!
> Tell me how to resize columns in a table?
> I do like this:
> ALTER TABLE t1 MODIFY (c1 TYPE VARCHAR(2500));
> or
> ALTER TABLE t1 ALTER (c1 TYPE VARCHAR(2500));
> But it does not work.
> 
> --
> ? ?????????,
> ???????? ????? ?????????? mailto:kofa_...@mail.ru
> ???????-??????????? ?? "????????"
> Skype: kofa_yox1
> ICQ: 552406342
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:33:47 +0100
> From: Simon Davies <simon.james.dav...@gmail.com>
> To: ????????? ????? <kofa_...@mail.ru>, General Discussion of SQLite
> Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] help
> Message-ID:
> <cang6ahs7zsoqanogeb8jj_cxame5kuyb7nv78wgbj_t7ox9...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
> 
> 2012/4/23 ????????? ????? <kofa_...@mail.ru>:
> > Hello,support!
> > Tell me how to resize columns in a table?
> > I do like this:
> > ALTER TABLE t1 MODIFY (c1 TYPE VARCHAR(2500));
> > or
> > ALTER TABLE t1 ALTER (c1 TYPE VARCHAR(2500));
> > But it does not work.
> >
> 
> The column does not have a size:
> http://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html
> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:41:54 +0200
> From: Steinar Midtskogen <stei...@latinitas.org>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Permissions
> Message-ID: <lbehreafwt....@cisco.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> [Richard Hipp]
> 
> > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Steinar Midtskogen
> > <stei...@latinitas.org>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Any reason why sqlite doesn't use the same file permissions as the
> >> database file when creating these extra files?
> >>
> >>
> > There was a change in version 3.7.11 to do exactly that.
> > http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/84b324606a
> 
> Oh, great! I'm just at 3.7.9, the latest on cpan. This was the
> fastest response to a feature request I've ever experienced. Fixed a
> few weeks before I asked the question!
> 
> -- 
> Steinar
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:43:29 +0400
> From: ????????? ????? <kofa_...@mail.ru>
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org, simon.james.dav...@gmail.com
> Subject: [sqlite] help
> Message-ID: <e1smgjx-0001rh-ts.kofa_yox-mail...@f213.mail.ru>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:33:47 +0100 ?? Simon Davies 
> <simon.james.dav...@gmail.com>:
> > 2012/4/23 ????????? ????? <kofa_...@mail.ru>:
> > > Hello,support!
> > > Tell me how to resize columns in a table?
> > > I do like this:
> > > ALTER TABLE t1 MODIFY (c1 TYPE VARCHAR(2500));
> > > or
> > > ALTER TABLE t1 ALTER (c1 TYPE VARCHAR(2500));
> > > But it does not work.
> > >
> > 
> > The column does not have a size:
> > http://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Simon
> > 
> 
> That is, If I explicitly pointed out the size of the column 150, still can 
> not write to the text of any reasonable length?
> 
> For example:
> 
> Table t1
> cid name type notnull dflt_value pk 
> ------- -------------- ----------------- ----------- -------------- --- 
> 0 GLOBALID INTEGER 1 1 
> 1 ID VARCHAR(30) 0 0 
> ...
> 11 COMMENT VARCHAR(150) 0 0 
> 
> So it is possible: ?
> UPDATE t1 SET comment = 'here the text of 160 characters long'
> 
> 
> ? ?????????,
> ????????? ?????
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:48:12 +0400
> From: ????????? ????? <kofa_...@mail.ru>
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: [sqlite] Help
> Message-ID: <e1smgow-0006xo-1j.kofa_yox-mail...@f91.mail.ru>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> 2012/4/23 ????????? ????? <kofa_...@mail.ru>:
> > Hello,support!
> > Tell me how to resize columns in a table?
> > I do like this:
> > ALTER TABLE t1 MODIFY (c1 TYPE VARCHAR(2500));
> > or
> > ALTER TABLE t1 ALTER (c1 TYPE VARCHAR(2500));
> > But it does not work.
> >
> ?
> The column does not have a size:
> http://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html
> ?
> Regards,
> Simon
> 
> --------------------
> That is, If I explicitly pointed out the size of the column 150, still can 
> not write to the text of any reasonable length?
> 
> For example:
> 
> Table t1
> cid name type notnull dflt_value pk 
> ------- -------------- ----------------- ----------- -------------- --- 
> 0 GLOBALID INTEGER 1 1 
> 1 ID VARCHAR(30) 0 0 
> ...
> 11 COMMENT VARCHAR(150) 0 0 
> 
> So it is possible: ?
> UPDATE t1 SET comment = 'here the text of 160 characters long'
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 11
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:07:21 +0400
> From: ????????? ????? <kofa_...@mail.ru>
> To: simon.james.dav...@gmail.com, sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: [sqlite] Help
> Message-ID: <e1smh73-0004u4-ft.kofa_yox-mail...@f15.mail.ru>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> Dear,Simon? James!
> Thank you very much. Worked!Similarly, the type has no size! From Russian 
> developer you respect!? =)
> 
> 
> 2012/4/23 ????????? ????? <kofa_...@mail.ru>:
> > Hello,support!
> > Tell me how to resize columns in a table?
> > I do like this:
> > ALTER TABLE t1 MODIFY (c1 TYPE VARCHAR(2500));
> > or
> > ALTER TABLE t1 ALTER (c1 TYPE VARCHAR(2500));
> > But it does not work.
> >
> ?
> The column does not have a size:
> 
> 
> ? ?????????,
> ????????? ?????
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 12
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:08:57 +0400
> From: niXman <i.nix...@gmail.com>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Help
> Message-ID:
> <CAMPTgK1FRr2a=img6g2fbqvx4q2bt052kbtjhofdogg_-wq...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> 23 ?????? 2012??. 15:07 ???????????? ????????? ?????:
> > From Russian developer you respect!? =)
> 
> ???? ?? ??? ??? ;)
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> ? niXman
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 13
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:35:20 +0100
> From: Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] free list performance
> Message-ID: <78a3dca7-cb20-4cd3-a091-f4cec8042...@bigfraud.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> 
> On 23 Apr 2012, at 11:15am, Max Vlasov <max.vla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Some time ago I worked with a database repeating the same sequence of
> > actions multiply times. They're basically:
> > - create table
> > - populate table
> > - do some deletes with some criteria
> > - drop table
> 
> Okay. That's obviously pointless. To help us it would be better to tell us 
> whether you do reads before or after 'do some deletes', or both.
> 
> > After about 20 times I started to notice the usual effects of internal
> > fragmentation (slowness in some usually quick operations and reports
> > of large seek from VFS). I assume this has something to do with the
> > way new pages allocated from free list. I narrowed it to a little test
> > that can reproduce this (tested with 3.7.10)
> > 
> > CREATE TABLE [TestTable] ([Id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT)
> > Insert into TestTable Default Values /* do this 1,000,000 times */
> > Delete from TestTable where (Id/1000) % 2 = 0
> > Drop table TestTable
> > 
> > This test makes the db very fragmented after about 10 steps.
> > 
> > I thought recently that the main source of internal fragmentation is
> > the nature of the data added. But looks like not only. Even if your
> > data is sequential, but the free_list is fragmented, then you would
> > probably get fragmented internal data. Is it possible to automatically
> > sort free_list from time to time? Or maybe some other solution if this
> > would cost too much?
> 
> Apart from the above, nice description of the problem. Makes it easier to 
> answer. Your guess about the free_list is correct, as far as I know.
> 
> You have two types of fragmentation: fragmentation of the database file in 
> your disk file system, and fragmentation of the data inside the database 
> file. The first one will make a big difference only under Windows and I 
> assume you can deal with it using the Windows tools.
> 
> For the second one, the simplest way to do something like defragment the data 
> inside the file is to use the VACUUM command:
> 
> <http://www.sqlite.org/lang_vacuum.html>
> 
> Do it whenever you like. In your case, immediately after dropping the table 
> might be good. An alternative to manually issuing the VACUUM command would be 
> to create a new database and set 'PRAGMA auto_vacuum=FULL' for it before 
> creating any tables. However note that the vacuuming done by this command 
> isn't identical to what VACUUM does. Read about it here:
> 
> <http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_auto_vacuum>
> 
> Simon.
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 14
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:49:37 +0200
> From: "Ghislain Segers" <ghislain.seg...@telenet.be>
> To: "General Discussion of SQLite Database" <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] free list performance
> Message-ID: <6B4D7813D04B4AAE9F90EF0F5BCA9749@PCvanVanZwam>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
> 
> Stop that BULLSHIT
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Simon Slavin" <slav...@bigfraud.org>
> To: "General Discussion of SQLite Database" <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 1:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] free list performance
> 
> 
> >
> > On 23 Apr 2012, at 11:15am, Max Vlasov <max.vla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Some time ago I worked with a database repeating the same sequence of
> >> actions multiply times. They're basically:
> >> - create table
> >> - populate table
> >> - do some deletes with some criteria
> >> - drop table
> >
> > Okay. That's obviously pointless. To help us it would be better to tell 
> > us whether you do reads before or after 'do some deletes', or both.
> >
> >> After about 20 times I started to notice the usual effects of internal
> >> fragmentation (slowness in some usually quick operations and reports
> >> of large seek from VFS). I assume this has something to do with the
> >> way new pages allocated from free list. I narrowed it to a little test
> >> that can reproduce this (tested with 3.7.10)
> >>
> >> CREATE TABLE [TestTable] ([Id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT)
> >> Insert into TestTable Default Values /* do this 1,000,000 times */
> >> Delete from TestTable where (Id/1000) % 2 = 0
> >> Drop table TestTable
> >>
> >> This test makes the db very fragmented after about 10 steps.
> >>
> >> I thought recently that the main source of internal fragmentation is
> >> the nature of the data added. But looks like not only. Even if your
> >> data is sequential, but the free_list is fragmented, then you would
> >> probably get fragmented internal data. Is it possible to automatically
> >> sort free_list from time to time? Or maybe some other solution if this
> >> would cost too much?
> >
> > Apart from the above, nice description of the problem. Makes it easier to 
> > answer. Your guess about the free_list is correct, as far as I know.
> >
> > You have two types of fragmentation: fragmentation of the database file in 
> > your disk file system, and fragmentation of the data inside the database 
> > file. The first one will make a big difference only under Windows and I 
> > assume you can deal with it using the Windows tools.
> >
> > For the second one, the simplest way to do something like defragment the 
> > data inside the file is to use the VACUUM command:
> >
> > <http://www.sqlite.org/lang_vacuum.html>
> >
> > Do it whenever you like. In your case, immediately after dropping the 
> > table might be good. An alternative to manually issuing the VACUUM 
> > command would be to create a new database and set 'PRAGMA 
> > auto_vacuum=FULL' for it before creating any tables. However note that 
> > the vacuuming done by this command isn't identical to what VACUUM does. 
> > Read about it here:
> >
> > <http://www.sqlite.org/pragma.html#pragma_auto_vacuum>
> >
> > Simon.
> > _______________________________________________
> > sqlite-users mailing list
> > sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 15
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:02:17 +0800
> From: Mohit Sindhwani <m...@onghu.com>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: [sqlite] Memory Usage/ Drawbacks of Statements
> Message-ID: <4f9544c9.8090...@onghu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Hi, our system does fairly predictable queries when it runs. A number 
> of modules all access data using a handful of queries of each. We open 
> the database at the start and close it at the end of the program.
> 
> Each query follows the usual pattern of prepare - bind - step - reset - 
> (eventually) finalize.
> 
> I was wondering if there is any known drawback in creating statements 
> up-front when the system is started and use them as and when they are 
> needed.
> 
> 1. Do statements do any thing that would require a lot of memory to be 
> maintained?
> 
> 2. Are there any known drawbacks of doing this?
> 
> 3. Finally, if sqlite3_reset is called multiple times before a bind, is 
> there a problem?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mohit.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 16
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:04:11 -0400
> From: Frank Chang <frank_chan...@hotmail.com>
> To: <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: [sqlite] Is it possible to preclude the latest sqlite 3.7.11
> Windows warning message?
> Message-ID: <blu149-w36c4b1ba70049798b81a188b...@phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> 
> 
> Good morning, We are trying to compile the latest SQLITE 3.7.11 release but 
> we keep getting the Windows Visual Studio 8 warning message: ---- warning 
> C4232: nonstandard extension used : 'pCurrent' : address of dllimport 
> 'AreFileApisANSI' is not static, identity not guaranteed showm below. 
> Is it possible to preclude and understand the meaning of this warning 
> message? Thank you.
> 
> e:\users\frank\dqt_memorymap\sqlite\sqlite3.c(32329) : warning C4232: 
> nonstandard extension used : 'pCurrent' : address of dllimport 
> 'AreFileApisANSI' is not static, identity not guaranteed 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 17
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:37:10 -0400
> From: Pavel Ivanov <paiva...@gmail.com>
> To: ????????? ????? <kofa_...@mail.ru>, General Discussion of SQLite
> Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] help
> Message-ID:
> <cag1a4rs1+d4p_bba48g_jwltrn7m-klqzgb0tqhc0j_feu9...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
> 
> > 11 ? ? ? COMMENT ? ? ? ? VARCHAR(150) ? ? ? 0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0
> >
> > So it is possible: ?
> > UPDATE t1 SET comment = 'here the text of 160 characters long'
> 
> Yes, that's possible. You can put text of any length into VARCHAR or
> TEXT field no matter what size you declare for it (you can even miss
> the size altogether, that won't make a difference).
> 
> 
> Pavel
> 
> 
> 2012/4/23 ????????? ????? <kofa_...@mail.ru>:
> > Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:33:47 +0100 ?? Simon Davies 
> > <simon.james.dav...@gmail.com>:
> >> 2012/4/23 ????????? ????? <kofa_...@mail.ru>:
> >> > Hello,support!
> >> > Tell me how to resize columns in a table?
> >> > I do like this:
> >> > ALTER TABLE t1 MODIFY (c1 TYPE VARCHAR(2500));
> >> > or
> >> > ALTER TABLE t1 ALTER (c1 TYPE VARCHAR(2500));
> >> > But it does not work.
> >> >
> >>
> >> The column does not have a size:
> >> http://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Simon
> >>
> >
> > That is, If I explicitly pointed out the size of the column 150, still can 
> > not write to the text of any reasonable length?
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > Table t1
> > cid ? ? ?name ? ? ? ? ? ?type ? ? ? ? ? ? ? notnull ? ? ?dflt_value ? ? ?pk
> > ------- -------------- ----------------- ----------- -------------- ---
> > 0 ? ? ? ?GLOBALID ? ? ? ?INTEGER ? ? ? ? ? ?1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1
> > 1 ? ? ? ?ID ? ? ? ? ? ? ?VARCHAR(30) ? ? ? ?0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0
> > ...
> > 11 ? ? ? COMMENT ? ? ? ? VARCHAR(150) ? ? ? 0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?0
> >
> > So it is possible: ?
> > UPDATE t1 SET comment = 'here the text of 160 characters long'
> >
> >
> > ? ?????????,
> > ????????? ?????
> > _______________________________________________
> > sqlite-users mailing list
> > sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 18
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:47:43 -0400
> From: Pavel Ivanov <paiva...@gmail.com>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Memory Usage/ Drawbacks of Statements
> Message-ID:
> <cag1a4ru_40jknjfbdvy-rrkuxthaavzc1xrnph4pvpc9jqk...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> > 1. Do statements do any thing that would require a lot of memory to be
> > maintained?
> 
> No, they don't need a lot of memory, but still some memory is used. So
> if you have like thousands of statements you should worry about this.
> If you have 20 or 30 statements your database cache will likely
> consume much more memory, so don't worry.
> 
> > 2. Are there any known drawbacks of doing this?
> 
> Preparing all statements takes some time which adds to startup time of
> your application. Also you could prepare some statements which won't
> be used later. If those are not problems for you then preparing all
> statements at startup is a way to go.
> 
> > 3. Finally, if sqlite3_reset is called multiple times before a bind, is
> > there a problem?
> 
> No, there's no problem in here.
> 
> 
> Pavel
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Mohit Sindhwani <m...@onghu.com> wrote:
> > Hi, our system does fairly predictable queries when it runs. ?A number of
> > modules all access data using a handful of queries of each. ?We open the
> > database at the start and close it at the end of the program.
> >
> > Each query follows the usual pattern of prepare - bind - step - reset -
> > (eventually) finalize.
> >
> > I was wondering if there is any known drawback in creating statements
> > up-front when the system is started and use them as and when they are
> > needed.
> >
> > 1. Do statements do any thing that would require a lot of memory to be
> > maintained?
> >
> > 2. Are there any known drawbacks of doing this?
> >
> > 3. Finally, if sqlite3_reset is called multiple times before a bind, is
> > there a problem?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mohit.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sqlite-users mailing list
> > sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 19
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:03:23 +0100
> From: Simon Davies <simon.james.dav...@gmail.com>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Is it possible to preclude the latest sqlite
> 3.7.11 Windows warning message?
> Message-ID:
> <cang6ahqcvmvl+z7r_kvqug1qwgnwuhwe3yp4c7glg+ysaps...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> On 23 April 2012 13:04, Frank Chang <frank_chan...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ? ? ? Good morning, We are trying to compile ?the latest SQLITE 3.7.11 
> > release but we keep getting the Windows Visual Studio 8 warning message: 
> > ---- warning C4232: nonstandard extension used : 'pCurrent' : address of 
> > dllimport 'AreFileApisANSI' is not static, identity not guaranteed showm 
> > below.
> > ? ? ? Is it possible to preclude and understand the meaning of this warning 
> > message? Thank you.
> >
> > e:\users\frank\dqt_memorymap\sqlite\sqlite3.c(32329) : warning C4232: 
> > nonstandard extension used : 'pCurrent' : address of dllimport 
> > 'AreFileApisANSI' is not static, identity not guaranteed
> 
> A quick google shows http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/9a1sy630.aspx
> 
> Would using /Ze instead of /Za do what you want?
> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 20
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:25:22 +0400
> From: Max Vlasov <max.vla...@gmail.com>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] free list performance
> Message-ID:
> <CAJtDhuDeeVRnhFB4=i6ught-bycq+wee2zdzrj7tr0dhcw+...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote:
> >
> > For the second one, the simplest way to do something like defragment the 
> > data inside the file is to use the VACUUM command:
> 
> Simon, thanks, I see what vacuum can do, sure I use it frequently as
> many of us. Ironically when I noticed the slowness, I did VACUUM that
> took almost a half an hour alone because the db contained other
> persistent data including big indexes. I think handling free list
> alone (for example allowing sort them only with a pragma) would help
> in cases like mine but unfortunately will add more confusion.
> 
> Max
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 21
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:01:27 +0100
> From: Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] free list performance
> Message-ID: <d352a74d-1ce8-4466-b1e6-fb6ff117a...@bigfraud.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> 
> On 23 Apr 2012, at 2:25pm, Max Vlasov <max.vla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> For the second one, the simplest way to do something like defragment the 
> >> data inside the file is to use the VACUUM command:
> > 
> > Simon, thanks, I see what vacuum can do, sure I use it frequently as
> > many of us. Ironically when I noticed the slowness, I did VACUUM that
> > took almost a half an hour alone because the db contained other
> > persistent data including big indexes. I think handling free list
> > alone (for example allowing sort them only with a pragma) would help
> > in cases like mine but unfortunately will add more confusion.
> 
> I think that the PRAGMA for auto-vacuum might be the right thing for your 
> situation. Unfortunately it would have to be done before any tables were 
> created. The simplest way to do this for a database which already exists 
> might be to use the shell tool to dump the existing database to SQL 
> statements, create a new database, do the PRAGMA, then read the data into the 
> new database.
> 
> Simon.
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 22
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:10:46 -0400
> From: Pavel Ivanov <paiva...@gmail.com>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] free list performance
> Message-ID:
> <CAG1a4rt6H4-TO4O7FCo3BAr7TVYQNUtv8jo=o54+c-3hmkf...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> > I think that the PRAGMA for auto-vacuum might be the right thing for your 
> > situation. ?Unfortunately it would have to be done before any tables were 
> > created. ?The simplest way to do this for a database which already exists 
> > might be to use the shell tool to dump the existing database to SQL 
> > statements, create a new database, do the PRAGMA, then read the data into 
> > the new database.
> 
> You can also run VACUUM after changing auto-vacuum mode. It will apply
> new auto-vacuum mode to a re-created database.
> 
> 
> Pavel
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 23 Apr 2012, at 2:25pm, Max Vlasov <max.vla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> For the second one, the simplest way to do something like defragment the 
> >>> data inside the file is to use the VACUUM command:
> >>
> >> Simon, thanks, I see what vacuum can do, sure I use it frequently as
> >> many of us. Ironically when I noticed the slowness, I did VACUUM that
> >> took almost a half an hour alone because the db contained other
> >> persistent data including big indexes. I think handling free list
> >> alone (for example allowing sort them only with a pragma) would help
> >> in cases like mine but unfortunately will add more confusion.
> >
> > I think that the PRAGMA for auto-vacuum might be the right thing for your 
> > situation. ?Unfortunately it would have to be done before any tables were 
> > created. ?The simplest way to do this for a database which already exists 
> > might be to use the shell tool to dump the existing database to SQL 
> > statements, create a new database, do the PRAGMA, then read the data into 
> > the new database.
> >
> > Simon.
> > _______________________________________________
> > sqlite-users mailing list
> > sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 23
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:19:00 +0800
> From: Mohit Sindhwani <m...@onghu.com>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Memory Usage/ Drawbacks of Statements
> Message-ID: <4f9564d4.9060...@onghu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Thanks Pavel,
> 
> That gives me something new to do with SQLite over the next few weeks.
> 
> On 23/4/2012 8:47 PM, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
> >> 1. Do statements do any thing that would require a lot of memory to be
> >> maintained?
> > No, they don't need a lot of memory, but still some memory is used. So
> > if you have like thousands of statements you should worry about this.
> > If you have 20 or 30 statements your database cache will likely
> > consume much more memory, so don't worry.
> >
> >> 2. Are there any known drawbacks of doing this?
> > Preparing all statements takes some time which adds to startup time of
> > your application. Also you could prepare some statements which won't
> > be used later. If those are not problems for you then preparing all
> > statements at startup is a way to go.
> >
> >> 3. Finally, if sqlite3_reset is called multiple times before a bind, is
> >> there a problem?
> > No, there's no problem in here.
> >
> >
> > Pavel
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 24
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:49:30 -0400
> From: Adam DeVita <adev...@verifeye.com>
> To: General Discussion of SQLite Database <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: [sqlite] error 404
> Message-ID:
> <CAC=yM-CgJ_yjuUWy1=RknmsX2JaL=iLLO2LkgcX=kbkyd4o...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Good day,
> 
> This page
> http://sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=SqliteNetwork
> 
> Is giving an error 404 for this link
> *SQL4Sockets* (http://www.oneledger.co.uk/sql4sockets.html)
> 
> regards,
> Adam
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 25
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:09:03 -0400
> From: Frank Chang <frank_chan...@hotmail.com>
> To: <sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
> Subject: [sqlite] Is it possible to preclude the latest sqlite 3.7.11
> Windows warning message?
> Message-ID: <blu149-w16d60d3b6c257d87ea7d3c8b...@phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> 
> Simon Davies, We tried your suggestion, /Ze on Visual Studio 2008, buy we are 
> still encountering Microsoft Visual 2008 warning, Thank you for your help.
> 
> 
> e:\users\frank\dqt_memorymap\sqlite\sqlite3.c(32329) : warning C4232: 
> nonstandard extension used : 'pCurrent' : address of dllimport 
> 'AreFileApisANSI' is not static, identity not guaranteed,
> 
> 
> --A quick google shows http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/9a1sy630.aspx
> 
> --Would using /Ze instead of /Za do what you want?
> 
> --Regards,
> --Simon
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
> 
> 
> End of sqlite-users Digest, Vol 52, Issue 23
> ********************************************
                                          
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to