> > And don't forget /D_CRT_DISABLE_PERFCRIT_LOCKS > Did know about this... Don't you just love obscure settings and behavior like this?
> Generated code is still of "Microsoft Quality" though (if you want proper > instruction scheduling and optimization that actual optimizes anything, > then use a real compiler, such as gcc or watcom). I only use MSVC in order > to integrate the runtimes with other things which use the MS compilers, not > because they are of any worth. Yes. But it also depends on the port. Which one do you use most? I like MinGW, for its simplicity, but it was a pain to set it up for x86-64. In my still very limited experience, the generated code from MinGW32 was not much (if at all) faster than MSVC, and compile times were higher. For me, that has always a bit disapointing (I guess I expected a gcc like performance). Anyway, I also ran the query on executables compiled with MinGW, although I did not really go into optimization settings for it. I tried -Ofast but since I would have to disable -ffast_math (and was not sure if the rest would work well) I just used -O3 instead. Original x86: 00:00:04.016 MSVC x86 (as before): 00:00:01.248 MSVC x86-64 (as before): 00:00:01.048 MinGW x86: 00:00:01.429 MinGW x86 -march=corei7-avx: 00:00:01.307 MinGW x86_64: 00:00:01.195 MinGW x86_64 -march=corei7-avx: 00:00:01.171 *Jonas Malaco Filho* _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
