On Thursday, May 31, 2012 11:53:18 f.h. Richard Hipp wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Charles Samuels <char...@cariden.com>wrote: > > So, I'd like to ask what's wrong with the session extension that it's > > never been rolled into the main distribution and hasn't been worked on > > since 2011 July? > > The sessions branch is stable and fully supported and will continue to be > supported.
What's the right way to go about using it? I have a fossil tree and I can switch to the branch, but how do I make sure that it's merged with 3.7.12.1 and also becomes part of the amalgamation tree? Sorry about the potentially stupid questions. > But I got negative feedback from the community when I proposed > it, so we've kept it out of trunk. You'll get positive feedback from *this* member of the community :) Seems strange that it's not at least off by default with an optional #define, in trunk. Charles _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
