I am using this feature a lot. My applications log all changes to the database, SQL and parameters. So I have an attached log.db with a field for the SQL and then 32 typeless columns for the parameters. Works like a charm!
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Baruch Burstein <[email protected]>wrote: > I am curious about the usefulness of sqlite's "unique" type handling, and > so would like to know if anyone has ever actually found any practical use > for it/used it in some project? I am referring to the typeless handling, > e.g. storing strings in integer columns etc., not to the non-truncating > system e.g. storing any size number or any length string (which is > obviously very useful in many cases). > Has anyone ever actually taken advantage of this feature? In what case? > > -- > ˙uʍop-ǝpısdn sı ɹoʇıuoɯ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
