I used Borland when I was a student too and a little bit after I graduated, I 
used OWL once, what a mistake, soon after Borland dropped the ball on OWL; left 
me stranded. Ever since I use GNU and GTKmm, they appear to be much more stable 
than Borland. Microsoft is stable, no doubt, but too complicated; just have a 
look at the madness of MFC or try to play a sound file using WIN API code. No 
man, I am not an advocate for anyone but me and what I find to be good. I am 
not loyal to companies or consortiums; I am loyal to me and what I find to be 
good to me.

MS was never free before FSF pushed it to give a bit of its millions of $ back, 
after that, even MS-Windows started to feel like Linux. Linux proved to be just 
as good as, and some times better than MS.

Linux developers didn't need the complexity of VS10 or a simple IDE like 
Code::Blocks to create or participate in the creation of an OS so much better 
than those using VS to develop theirs.
MS-VS developers should spend more time creating more effective documentation 
and less time developing a new Language/Dialect for the IT industry.

Genius might have limitations, but stupidity is no handicap
Eat Kosher


-----Original Message-----
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] 
On Behalf Of John Drescher
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 9:57 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] VC++ and SQLite

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Arbol One <arbol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Following the advice of MSN:
> Open the project's Property Pages dialog box. For details, see Setting Visual 
> C++ Project Properties.
> Click the C/C++ folder.
> Click the Advanced property page.
> Modify the Force Includes property.
>
> and now my Force Include property text entry box has the word: 
> stdafx.h
>
> This now produces the following error:
> fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'stdafx.h': No such file 
> or directory
> 1>  strtools.cpp.
> What else needs to be changed now?
>
> PD
> Why is MS paying people to create software that is soooo complicated to use?

The PCH requirements and behavior are the same as they have been since at least 
the mid 1990s but probably longer. Before that I used borland compilers.

John
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to