I should have also noted that in most cases the original query is a complicated 
multiple join statement, not a simple table query so there is no rowid that I 
can rely on unless I do generate a temp table.

Vance

on May 24, 2013, ven...@intouchmi.com wrote:
>
>Thanks to James, Keith and Michael for your input!
>
>I don't have any control over the original query. It may or may not include an 
>ORDER
>BY clause. Ideally it would, which makes the question about repeated result 
>order
>moot.
>I was hoping that by making the exact same query to build a temporary table, 
>SQLite
>would go through the same procedure thereby loading the temp table in the same 
>order
>that stepping would have generated. If this hope is faulty, it would be 
>interesting
>to know why. And, since the temporary table generates a rowid with sequential 
>#s
>starting with '1', I could use that to control how the various Find commands 
>selects
>a row based on the current value of X. Note that X was originally the number 
>of times
>the original prepared statement was stepped through by repeated calls to 
>sqlite_step.
>Note to Michael - I realize that SQLite does not have find commands which is 
>why
>I have to implement them.
>I don't think that I can just combine the new criteria with the original 
>select because
>that would most likely cause the rows to be presented in a different order.
>
>Vance
>
>on May 24, 2013, James K. Lowden <jklow...@schemamania.org> wrote:
>>
>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 18:38:57 -0600
>>"Keith Medcalf" <kmedc...@dessus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > And, can I depend on SQLite to generate results in the same order
>>> > as the original prepare/step sequence and the temp table
>>> > generation, ie. is the temp table's rowid going to be consistent
>>> > with the original step order?
>>> 
>>> If you use an ORDER BY clause, yes. If not, then the rows are
>>> returned in random order.
>>
>>Pardon me while I fix that for you. 
>>
>> s/random/nondeterministic/ 
>>
>>but for the purposes of discussion much the same: without ORDER BY, the
>>order cannot be relied on. 
>>
>>--jkl
>>_______________________________________________
>>sqlite-users mailing list
>>sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>>http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>>
>_______________________________________________
>sqlite-users mailing list
>sqlite-users@sqlite.org
>http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to