On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:02 PM, Philip Bennefall <phi...@blastbay.com> wrote:
> That is exactly the sort of thing I am looking for. If anything, I think it'd > be great to have such a vfs in SqLite if only for > completeness/customizability, seeing as how there are so many different > allocators for example. It'd be great to have the same level of freedom with > the vfs backends. Of course, I want to use the existing methods in the native > vfs for randomization, time etc - just override the file I/O methods to > operate on a large byte array/blob. memvfs? http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.sqlite.general/46450 _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
