Thanks, Simon. > As a risk, I see overriding an existing collation name as risky. If any > application makes changes to the database without the extension loaded, > you're going to get corrupt indexes. Can you instead make up a new > collation name ?
I did not think about this, but in our case it should not be that hot. It is an embedded application and the users are not supposed to manipulate the DB directly. (In some cases the OS efficiently hides the DB file.) Best regards, Jan Slodicka -- View this message in context: http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/Collation-advice-tp70668p70673.html Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
