Silly question.. I looked at the fix. Why ignore indexes with greater than 4 fields? Isn't that a bit risky? Wouldn't it be better to ignore the fields after the 4th one for planning?
-----Original Message----- From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Richard Hipp Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:38 AM To: General Discussion of SQLite Database Subject: Re: [sqlite] segmentation fault with 3.8.0 On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Stephen Chrzanowski <pontia...@gmail.com>wrote: > My guess is single quotes instead of double quotes. Where exactly is > the seg fault? Untested but other than the quotes, everything looks fine. > The problem is described here: http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/9f2eb3abac The fix is here: http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/c1152bdcbb A patch release 3.8.0.1 that includes this fix and fixes for two other equally obscure corner cases is currently in test and is expected to go out later today. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users This email and any attachments are only for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged, confidential, proprietary or otherwise private information. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, dissemination, distribution or other disclosure of the contents of this e-mail or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
