The developers choose the C type 'int' to represent the hash value.
Possibly this is too small for your case?
Op 6 sep 2013, om 22:00 heeft Harmen de Jong - CoachR Group B.V. het
volgende geschreven:
On 6 sep. 2013, at 20:09, "Kevin Benson" <kevin.m.ben...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Dr. Hipp does a little bit of explaining on this topic, generally,
in his
replies on this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.org/msg78602.html
Thanks for pointing me to that thread, but as dr. Hipp states in
this thread, the tables are stored in a hash. Therefore I would not
expect a large performance decrease on large number of tables at
all, or am I missing something?
Best regards,
Harmen
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
