On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 13:01:37 +0100 Gert Van Assche <ger...@datamundi.be> wrote:
> Thanks James -- the select query is something I could do, but the > update one I could not get that one right. > I was considering to create a new table based on the select query, > but since the real data set is millions of records, an update was the > best solution. You're welcome, Gert. Implicitly I was recommending a view: instead of periodically updating a table with derived information, let SQLite always provide up-to-date information by deriving it on demand. With a dataset of millions of records, is performance on such a view much different from that of a table? I don't happen to have such a sample handy, and I'm curious what you've seen. --jkl _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
