Hi All,
Thank you all about the help on adding tables. Adding the tables between transactions did help a lot. Speed is now ok. I received a suggestion that in my case is quite valid: My tables have all the same number of columns ( 1 column only.. of BLOBs.) and Simon Slavin suggested I could use only one big table where I add an extra column to identify the table name. This seems quite a nice approach, because it does seems to be more memory efficient in terms of disk usage. However my question is the following: Let's assume that TABLE now designates my real tables that can be either SQLITE tables or sub groups of records inside one big real SQLite table I have to load to memory and save to DB groups of these TABLE at the same time ( by saving I refer to update or save the blobs inside each table ). What if faster? Accessing a table in SQLite and updating deleting or adding new records Or Querying the records of one table in such a way that the select records have a field = Table Name..and then adding and updating these records. ( by updating I mean using the direct functions for incremental BLOB access ) Thank you All Carlos _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
