You didn't provide the data set, so it'll be a guess.

You'll need to look at the data and do some mental work on comparing what
you expect versus what your query result comes back with, and prove what is
in the database is what your query is EXACTLY asking for.  (Returning on
last names of Smith?)

In the case of your query, your table apparently has 24 records or rows.
Your validation compared to the query is incorrect (Unless the exercise is
to take the given validation result and you provide the full query, in
which case, you WILL have to look at the raw data).  You're validation
statement should also show what you queried for.  Saying you queried 200
records (Which can be true) and got 4 results doesn't show what the query
is asking for, which isn't enough information.

Things to look out for;

- Assuming a larger table, if you queried for 200 rows, who's to say that
row 201-205 didn't include your conditional?  In this case, this validation
statement IS valid, but since searching 200 of 24 rows is going to give you
only 24 rows anyways, the other 176 rows don't exist.  This statement WON'T
be a valid check the moment you hit 201 rows unless you provide additional
sorting and possibly conditionals.
- What statement was used to return just 4 results?

To try and ease the intimidation off, you can compare the Structured Query
Language to act like pulling data out of any kind of spreadsheet.  At the
base of any database, the lowest level of usable and desirable information
is stored in tables.  Thinking of just a single table, each row going
across is a group of data, or using HSL (Human Structured Language), a row
in a table is comparable to being a sentence.  Each field/cell/column is a
piece of data relevant to that row in some way, or for HSL, a
field/cell/column is a word in a sentence.  At the most basic intro level,
in SQL, the SELECT statement tells the engine "I want this data", WHERE
says "But whatever is returned has to meet this criteria", and ORDER BY
means "I want the results ordered by these conditions and/or values in the
specified field".

IE: SELECT dbo.Firstname, dbo.Lastname from dbo.Employees where
dbo.Lastname='Smith' order by dbo.FirstName;

(dbo = Microsoft stuffs.  I'm assuming you're using SQL2k8 and this relates
to Northwind?  If this question doesn't makes sense to you, ignore my
question)

If you break down what a database is down to its elements, the concepts of
what a database IS is really easy.  Once you start building your own tables
and inserting your own data from scratch, you'll start to see how
elementary getting basic results are and how the pieces fit together.  The
tricky part is the knowing how to take what you've got in your head, seeing
the results you want in your minds eye, and converting it to a standard
language.  At the level you're at, all SQL engines have the same syntax.
Later on you're get into nuances of the language between engines, but you
can treat that like to spoken languages like Polish and Ukrainian, or US
English to UK English -- Pretty close to the same thing, but, different
accents and words to get the same thing or idea.

On a personal note, honestly, I do see that there is merit to being
provided a database and then have students try to work with that data, but,
sometimes to some people, that'd be like building a house without a
foundation.  The whole Microsoft Northwind database (At least back in
SQL2K) is nice to play with, but being told "Here is your table, here's the
language, get me results" doesn't jive for the people who don't see what a
constitutes a table, cell, row, or column actually is.

(Just for comedy relief)

For me, when I have to think about different things, I sometimes THINK in
SQL.  So something like "When I was in Toronto last month, how many parking
lots did I pass that cost more than $20/day?" and (sadly) I'll start seeing
flashbacks of each parking lot I remember, and quite often the wife will
have to slap me out of that coma due to so many results..... A query like
that would be [ select ParkingLotImage from Locations_Details_ParkingLot
where Cost>20 and month(SeenDate)=month(date(now(),"-1 month")) and
City="Toronto" ] -- And yes, SQL Fanatics, I can normalize that further to
Locations.DetailID = Details.DetailsID and and have "ParkingLot" as a
result in Details, but I've only got so much memory storage and get
distracted easily, I'll EASILY get corrupted..... ;)



On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Dwight Harvey <
dharv...@students.northweststate.edu> wrote:

> I am a student with no Tech or IT background what so ever.
>
> I am new to Databases and IT in general.
>
> I am taking an accelerated class in database basics and within the last
> three weeks I just learned what databases were.
>
> I know very little and Databases are complex and intimidating.
>
> I figured out how to run queries but I don't know if they are
> correct/accurate, as in what I requested from the 'RUN' results?
>
> How do you 'VERIFY' your query results?
>
>
> My instructor wants me to explain how do I KNOW that the records are
> accurate. Here is an example of what is expected in the assignment...
>
>  *VERIFICATION:  *What is verification?  Each time you retrieve data, you
> should ask yourself, "How do I know I selected the correct data?".   For
> example, if you were asked to pull all records written by an author named
> Fred Smith, your query might be based on last name equal to Smith.
> However, if you might get records for someone with the first name of Fred,
> Mary and Ginger.   What would you do to insure you are pulling only Fred?
> The person who has requested the data will always want assurance from you
> that you are 100% positive you pulled the correct records.  Look at the
> records returned and always as yourself, did I pull the correct records?
> How would I verify it?
>
> "Capture each query, number of records returned and *explain your
> validation of the query.*" Example:
>
> /** First query 1. List all employees **/
> SELECT dbo.Firstname, dbo.Lastname
> FROM dbo.employees
> --records returned: 24
> *--Validation:  I did a quick listing of top 200 records and 4 were
> returned*.
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to