I'm not sure I'd even consider it broken.

SQLite is wonderful.  Simply wonderful.  Code size and amount of features 
forced into it impresses me no end.  But, it was never intended to run with the 
big dogs.  The fact that, quite often, it can is a tribute to the people that 
work on it.

When making a 'lite' version of something, it's normal to eliminate difficult 
or intensive features that can be lived without.  I think this is one of them.

Marc

-----Original Message-----
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] 
On Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 9:18 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqlite bugreport : unique index causes valid updates to 
fail

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Marc L. Allen <mlal...@outsitenetworks.com>
wrote:

> I am like you, Gwendal, in that I don't like that behavior in SQLite; 
> however, not liking it doesn't make it a bug.
>

​On another of my forums, this is called a BAD - Broken, As Designed.​ As 
opposed to the normal WAD - Working As Designed.

--
The temperature of the aqueous content of an unremittingly ogled culinary 
vessel will not achieve 100 degrees on the Celsius scale.

Maranatha! <><
John McKown
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users



This email and any attachments are only for use by the intended recipient(s) 
and may contain legally privileged, confidential, proprietary or otherwise 
private information. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, dissemination, 
distribution or other disclosure of the contents of this e-mail or its 
attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to