-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/08/2015 07:18 AM, Fabian Pr?bstl wrote: > Is there an easy way of configuring / changing this so that > SHARED_WRITE is not acquired? Will SQLite even function? Is it just > easier to create a hidden copy and work on that?
For something this critical, an alternate approach is to restructure it so you have a service which does the database and similar work, and a separate gui that talks to the service. (Note I mean service in the Windows sense, much like a daemon on Unix.) You can run the service as a different user, which means the gui application user can't even access the file directly, nor cause mayhem. That separate structuring also has other benefits such as allowing for a separate command line client, makes testing easier, and you can put the service and gui on different machines. Multiple instances of the gui can run too which may be very useful. Roger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlUlVvkACgkQmOOfHg372QTvbgCg2cy3bsDgRj8TiOLbsvWbr8cQ 1VoAn2ZAajXnlQwlsd9mzkf3R7k/racZ =kyDP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
