On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Simon Slavin <slavins at bigfraud.org> wrote:
> > On 28 Apr 2015, at 11:49pm, Scott Robison <scott at casaderobison.com> wrote: > > > I never saw a segfault in my case, though I never tried anything on any > > posix style system. It was strictly Windows. > > Windows doesn't call it segfault. It will report an access violation or > (very occasionally) a page fault. > I am aware of this. My point was that an illegal memory access never occurred in my use on Windows. Perhaps because I checked all error codes and did not continue trying to process data in an error state. Regardless of what they're called, they are the same thing. A rose is a rose. -- Scott Robison
