On 7/15/15, T?r?k Edwin <edwin+sqlite3 at etorok.net> wrote: > On 07/15/2015 08:34 PM, T?r?k Edwin wrote: > > In fact such detection could be added to fuzzcheck.c too (I didn't know that > you can detect presence of address sanitizer at compile time until now):
It's a clever idea. I'm not so sure I want to add this to fuzzcheck. I think I'd like to have the ability to get ASAN to fail using fuzzcheck. > > Index: test/fuzzcheck.c > ================================================================== > --- test/fuzzcheck.c > +++ test/fuzzcheck.c > @@ -737,10 +737,19 @@ > char *zDbName = ""; /* Appreviated name of a source database */ > const char *zFailCode = 0; /* Value of the TEST_FAILURE environment > variable */ > int cellSzCkFlag = 0; /* --cell-size-check */ > int sqlFuzz = 0; /* True for SQL fuzz testing. False for DB > fuzz */ > int iTimeout = 120; /* Default 120-second timeout */ > + > +#if defined(__has_feature) > +# if __has_feature(address_sanitizer) > + cellSzCkFlag = 1; > +# endif > +#endif > +#ifdef __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ > + cellSzCkFlag = 1; > +#endif > > iBegin = timeOfDay(); > #ifdef __unix__ > signal(SIGALRM, timeoutHandler); > #endif > > > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > -- D. Richard Hipp drh at sqlite.org
