Fair enough. On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:24 PM, dandl <david at andl.org> wrote:
> > > Richard Hipp seems to be on record as saying: > > > "SQLite can be thought of as a derivative of PostgreSQL. SQLite was > > > originally written from PostgreSQL 6.5 documentation, and the SQLite > > > developers still use PostgreSQL as a reference platform to verify that > > > SQLite is working correctly." > > > > > > Not a major problem for me, just an interesting footnote. > > > > > > > The way I recall hearing it expressed in talks I've watched (recorded > after > > the fact, never live) is that when situations arise that need resolution, > the > > question is often asked "what does PostgreSQL do?" Sadly, the backward > > compatibility requirements prohibit SQLite from being a 100% feature / > > implementation match. > > Absolutely so. Nevertheless, it would be pretty minor to add LIMIT ALL as a > synonym for LIMIT -1. If you wanted to enhance compatibility. > > Regards > David M Bennett FACS > > Andl - A New Database Language - andl.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > -- Scott Robison
