Just a quick question. I am actually deciding if I need to do some performance testing of this but thought I might gain some quick insight. My specific insert and table are below but really I am looking for a general answer to the question not just this specific case.
Are there any performance or other considerations of the order of the fields for an insert? Are the following equivalent? regardless of number of values inserting? regardless of size of the data being inserted? INSERT INTO mytable( wid1,cnt, dat, wid3,wid2) VALUES (?,?,?,?) - VS - INSERT INTO mytable( wid1,wid2,wid3,cnt ,dat ) VALUES (?,?,?,?) CREATE TABLE mytable ( id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT" , wid1 INTEGER REFERENCES othertable ( id ) ON DELETE CASCADE , wid2 INTEGER REFERENCES othertable ( id ) ON DELETE CASCADE , wid3 INTEGER REFERENCES othertable ( id ) ON DELETE CASCADE , cnt INTEGER DEFAULT 1 ,dat TEXT ) Jeff _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users