On 11/3/05, Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree that moving away from the standard is a bad thing, but this > change does not in any way merit forking SQLite or changing its name. > SQLite currently deviates from the standard in much more significant > ways than this proposed (well its more than proposed now) change. It > lacks many standard functions, has no support for standard dates or > times, and no support for referential integrity for example.
An excellent point, one that I didn't consider. > In summary: SQLite is good. Standards are good. I hope SQLite moves > towards the SQL standard. I agree. I wanted to suggest that if the design goals are changing and DRH is headed in a different direction he should put on his turn signals... Seems it's overwhelming not a popular idea ;) I'm sure a lot of people would benefit from the typeless version.
