"Andrew Finkenstadt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any objections to taking back patches that bit-wise and the result of the > overflowing addition with 0xff ? >
The variables being added are unsigned chars and the result is stored in an unsigned char. Am I to understand that you have a compiler that does not limit the range of an unsigned char to 0x00 through 0xff? -- D. Richard Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
