Gilles Ganault wrote: > But then, how many people use SQLite to handle 68 milions rows > in a table?
That's a good question. I don't know. And I don't know if there is a recommended size for SQLite databases. But I was able to create the index in 12 minutes after I set the right cache_size. The usage I foresee for SQLite is that structured data is provided for download and personal analysis, rather than XML dumps or Excel spreadsheets. And today I can easily download a 3 gigabyte database file, which is only 600 megabytes compressed. Over on the unison mailing list (Unison is a tool for doing 2-way rsync, file transfers) we're constantly amazed that people complain they are unable to transfer terabytes in a single transfer. Who could have imagined. Maybe Gordon Moore. My 68 million rows come from the Swedish Wikipedia, which is my small experimentation base before I try this on the full size German or English Wikipedia. But I might have to back down to the Estonian or Faroese Wikipedia to get an even smaller dataset. -- Lars Aronsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
