Martin Pfeifle <martinpfei...@yahoo.de> wrote: > Maybe I am totally mistaken. > Assume I always use the latest sqlite_shell.exe program. I do not > want to change anything in this program, > then I cannot connect to my virtual file system which is written in C > and stored in "myExtension.dll".
Why? Can't you do "select load_extension" on that DLL, and the DLL would then call sqlite3_vfs_register in its entry point? Am I missing something obvious? > In contrast loadable extensions can be used. I don't understand the distinction you make between loadable extension and loadable VFS. A DLL loaded into SQLite-using process can call sqlite3_create_function, or sqlite3_create_collation, or sqlite3_vfs_register. How is the latter fundamentally different from the former? > For me loadable extensions and virtual file systems are somehow > similar No. Custom functions and virtual file systems are similar. Loadable extension is a vehicle for packaging either, or both. Igor Tandetnik _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
