Is that to say that the 'split on the source file' that is yet to be made is
the reason
for the branching described below (see highlighted below) - can you, please,
explain further, I am still lost? That question still remains a question,
please help . . .
And now, another . . if you don't mind . .
when I tried to set a breakpoint at the definition (in sqlite3.c file) of the
function,SQLITE_API
u8 state = 0; intsqlite3_complete(constchar*zSql){/* Current state, using
numbers defined in header comment */u8 token;
not currently be hit. No executable code is associated with this line. Possible
causes include: preprocessir directives or compiler/linker optimizations.
I would really like dislodge/remove as many of the preprocessor directives and
options for compiler/linker optimization as possible. Mine is a search
project;
I need to strip off the sophistication used all over to have just the bare
application.
Can you help me?
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Black, Michael (IS)" <michael.bla...@ngc.com>
To: u okafor <uo07...@yahoo.com>; General Discussion of SQLite Database
<sqlite-users@sqlite.org>
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 8:17 AM
Subject: RE:[sqlite] Fw: A question on sqlite processing
This was just answered in another chain. Visual Studio has a 64k limit on
source code files for the debugger (thanks Microsoft...a 16-bit
limit?...really!).
If you need to step into it use WinDbg
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg463009
Nobody has done a split on the source file yet to make it < 64k.
Michael D. Black
Senior Scientist
Advanced Analytics Directorate
Advanced GEOINT Solutions Operating Unit
Northrop Grumman Information Systems
________________________________
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] on
behalf of u okafor [uo07...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 3:24 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: EXT :[sqlite] Fw: A question on sqlite processing
Dear sir,
I have built a project solution in Visual Studio environment (version 10) using
a free
amalgamation source down from SQLite website and I am debugging. My first
question is - when I invoke sqlite3_complete() out of the shell.c source file,
control
passes into the body of sqlite3PagerSetPageSize(Pager *pPager, ..) function, a
method defined in sqlite3.c file (rather than going to a function defined in
sqlite3.c
file as sqlite3_complete()). please explain this phenomenon and the reason
behind
it . . . it's a similar occurrence also with sqlite3_config.
It is consistent and obviously with a reason - only I don't know what that
reason is,
please help
Yours truly,
uzo okafor
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org>
To: u okafor <uo07...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: A question on sqlite processing
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:26 PM, u okafor <uo07...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear sir,
>I am a research student who is currently using freely downloaded software from
>SQLite.
>I have a few questions and would appreciate if you can call me back @ (973)
>332 0997
>My questions are so simple, I promise . .
>uzo okafor
>
>
I am on travel. Questions to sqlite-users@sqlite.org will get answered quickly.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
/* Value of the next token */I was not allowed, a message showed (moemtarily)
that said 'The breakpoint will
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
