On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Simone P. Lossani <simoloss...@libero.it>wrote:
> I red a lot of article and documentation but I have not solved the problem. > Maybe with temporary DB I can have the same performance and also I can > share > DB? > Have you some suggestion? > On a full-blown machine you could use shared memory, probably. How about using your :memory: db as the main one and simultaneously queue the commits into an on-disk db which other apps would then read? (Or do they need to also update the db?) They would be a little bit behind the master, of course. -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
