Brad Hards wrote: > > Is there a workaround to get at the underlying connection from my > extension function class? >
Not easily because they are technically not associated with a particular connection (i.e. they are simply imported into each opened connection from a static list. > > Is there anything to be aware of in implementing a "SQLiteFunction2" > that does allow access to the underlying connection? > You'll need to figure out when the functions should be imported into the connection and how to deal with name collisions (i.e. unless you plan on removing the existing mechanism). -- Joe Mistachkin _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
