Thanks for your speedy response. Your reasons make a lot of sense. I like the fact that you are open to reacting to what could be considered an important incremental release (and also 100% agree with the volume of changes!).
Thanks for the update! Chris On Sep 10, 10:02 am, "David Crawshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tend to be conservative updating the SQLite build, for two reasons. > The first is being conservative with such a reliable and incremental > project like SQLite is just best practice. The second is that I am > short on time. Often a particular issue comes up that I want to fix > before the next release and do not manage, so updating becomes a > problem. > > At the moment, I want to switch to using the standard source (for > FTS2) and modify my release process to using VMWare, so I can provide > Linux builds again. That's kept me from recent releases. As 3.4.1 was > important however, I've just dumped the changes I was going to make > and uploaded version 037, based on 3.4.2. > > David > > On 10/09/2007, Chris Hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > We are considering the Zentus JDBC driver and are impressed by its > > speed and robustness so far. > > > One concern is the frequency of updates to the driver - I see SQLite > > is on 3.4.2 at the moment, while Zentus is 3.4.0. The concern is that > > release 3.4.1 is "recommended for all users". > > > Clearly we can recompile our own, but then we lose the strength of a > > community project. > > > David your comments would be appreciated. > > > Thanks > > > Chris. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Mailing List: http://groups.google.com/group/sqlitejdbc?hl=en To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
