[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13116878#comment-13116878
 ] 

Ken Krugler commented on SQOOP-350:
-----------------------------------

@David - it looks like this parameter is one set in sqoop-site.xml, yes? If so, 
then that's not a good solution for us, as we have one import we do that has to 
use a single mapper, in which case OraOop won't be used, right?

                
> Add support for requiring that a connector be used, otherwise the job should 
> fail
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SQOOP-350
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-350
>             Project: Sqoop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: connectors
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>            Reporter: Ken Krugler
>
> There are situations where it is critical that a specific connector be used 
> during a Sqoop. For example, if you have a table that doesn't have a suitable 
> column for partitioning, and thus you're relying on OraOop's row-based 
> partitioning, then it's critical that OraOop be used. If the Sqoop request 
> falls back to the generic Oracle connector, this puts huge, unacceptable load 
> on the database.
> The proposal is to add a -connector <class name> parameter, which will cause 
> the job to fail unless it's handled by the connector (from 
> sqoop.ConnFactory.getManager) with the matching class name.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to