Hi Jarcec, Just to be sure that we are voting on consistent set of binaries, I suggest that you copy them over to r3 candidate directory and restart the VOTE thread. Thanks for taking this through.
Arvind On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[email protected]>wrote: > Thank you very much for your testing sir. I'm not quite sure how my > temporal directory went to release tarbals, however I missed it and I'm > sorry for that. > > I've repacked 0.20 and 1.0.0 tarball (including signature and md5sum). Do > I need to restart the voting as well? > > Jarcec > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 05:38:09PM -0800, Bilung Lee wrote: > > Look good overall, but one thing though. You would need to get rid of > the > > redundant "jarcec" directory in those two new (0.20 and 1.0.0) binary > > tarballs. > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version > > > 1.4.1-incubating. > > > > > > Changes from -r1: > > > > > > * Fixed LICENSE.txt files (Thanks Bilung!) > > > * Binary artifacts for all supported versions (Thanks Arvind!) > > > > > > *** Please cast your vote by [3 days after sending] *** > > > > > > The list of fixed issues: > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sqoop/branches/branch-1.4.1/CHANGES.txt > > > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), checksum (*.md5), > > > and test result (log/*.ant_test.log): > > > http://people.apache.org/~jarcec/sqoop-1.4.1-incubating-rc2/ > > > > > > The tag to be voted upon: > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sqoop/tags/release-1.4.1-rc2 > > > > > > The KEYS file: > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/sqoop/KEYS > > > >
