> On 2012-03-05 17:22:27, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > > Thanks for the patch Jarcec. I think it will be better to depend upon > > 0.92.0 release as opposed to snapshot. I understand that the 0.92.0 does > > not have it's test artifact deployed on the maven repository yet, but > > hopefully they will do that soon (I pinged them this morning). > > > > Thanks > > Jarek Cecho wrote: > Thank you very much for the ping Arvind. I got an impression that they > are not planning to deploy testing jar for 0.92.0 version at all and that > they will do that for 0.92.1. I'll be happy to change my patch and retest it > once again after they publish it. > > Jarcec > > Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > I raised this as a request on the hbase-dev list [1]. Hopefully they will > respond soon - but if they decide not to, then we have no choice but to go > with the 0.92.1-SNAPSHOT version as per your patch. > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/6xmf2xvv6sf37mni >
Hi Jarcec - the HBase 0.92.0 test artifact is also available via central repository now. Please update your patch and I will be happy to commit it. Thanks for waiting on this. Thanks - Arvind ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4169/#review5612 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2012-03-04 09:12:13, Jarek Cecho wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/4169/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2012-03-04 09:12:13) > > > Review request for Sqoop, Arvind Prabhakar and Bilung Lee. > > > Summary > ------- > > I've changed dependency to 0.92.1-SNAPSHOT. > > > This addresses bug SQOOP-454. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-454 > > > Diffs > ----- > > /build.xml 1296766 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4169/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > ant -Dhadoopversion={100,23} test > > > Thanks, > > Jarek > >
