Hi, sorry for butting in but I am a bit confused by this discussion, as it seems to be straying from the technical merit; this is my attempt at getting back to the core of the topic.
Amos claims that its stated objective can be achieved by other, already-existing, features, and that it this proposal has a high false-positive rate. So in my opinion the easiest way to move the discussion forward is to: 1. find one use-case which cannot be covered by existing features 2a. claim that the false-positive scenarios found by Amos are either intentional or not incorrect, OR 2b. find ways to reduce the false positives in the scenarios hihglighted by Amos, OR 2c. rework the existing features (if possible) to allow the "early detection" which is in my understanding the most touted benefit of the proposed solution Am I missing something obvious? Kinkie
_______________________________________________ squid-dev mailing list squid-dev@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
