At 11.20 12/07/2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-12 at 18:42, Serassio Guido wrote:
> Interesting, but, please, do you can give an example, I'm not sure to > understand how make this right.
in Array.h: delete: " template<class C> typename C::value_type & VectorIteratorBase<C>::operator *() const { return theVector->items[pos]; }
template<class C> typename C::value_type * VectorIteratorBase<C>::operator -> () const { return &theVector->items[pos]; } "
within the VectorIteratorBase definition, (lines 59 and 60 for me): change " typename C::value_type & operator *() const; typename C::value_type * operator -> () const; "
to
" typename C::value_type & VectorIteratorBase<C>::operator *() const { return theVector->items[pos]; } typename C::value_type * VectorIteratorBase<C>::operator -> () const { return &theVector->items[pos]; } "
Thanks, but now I get different errors:
c:\work\nt-3.0\include\array.h(60) : error C2063: '*' : not a function
c:\work\nt-3.0\include\array.h(75) : see reference to class template instantiation 'VectorIteratorBase<C>' being compiled
c:\work\nt-3.0\include\array.h(60) : error C2040: '*' : 'generic-type-257 &(void) const' differs in levels of indirection from 'int'
c:\work\nt-3.0\include\array.h(75) : see reference to class template instantiation 'VectorIteratorBase<C>' being compiled
c:\work\nt-3.0\include\array.h(60) : fatal error C1903: unable to recover from previous error(s); stopping compilation
c:\work\nt-3.0\include\array.h(75) : see reference to class template instantiation 'VectorIteratorBase<C>' being compiled
And this is the changed source from line 59
typename C::value_type & VectorIteratorBase<C>::operator *() const
{ <== This is my line 60
return theVector->items[pos];
}
typename C::value_type * VectorIteratorBase<C>::operator -> () const
{
return &theVector->items[pos];
}// typename C::value_type & operator *() const;
// typename C::value_type * operator -> () const;
ssize_t operator - (VectorIteratorBase const &rhs) const;
bool incrementable() const;
private:
size_t pos;
C * theVector;
}; <== This is my line 75Uhmm, IIRC MSVC costs a large amount of $$$, whereas mingw is free. mingw is also, as I understand it, a better C++ compiler. If the reactos project carries on well, gcc will have SEH as well soon (if it doesn't already - I'm a little out of date there). I'm not at all sure that the MSVC install base is larger than the mingw/cygwin (because it can compile for mingw). But thats a different discussion.
I agree totally, but I remember too the VHS / Video 2000 / Betamax fight for the Video Tape standardization:
the winner was VHS, the worse technology ..... (sigh !)
> So I think that we should to try to make Squid 3 compatible with MSVC.
Certainly, we'll try.
Thanks for the support !
Regards
Guido
- ======================================================== Guido Serassio Acme Consulting S.r.l. Via Gorizia, 69 10136 - Torino - ITALY Tel. : +39.011.3249426 Fax. : +39.011.3293665 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
