Hi Henrik, > Now committed to 2.5 as there was no objections, and I consider this a > major flaw of Squid.
Thanks for fixing this, I added it to the last debian packages reverting my old patch for >2GB support. Apparently the aufs+2GB patches caused some problems with diskd, can you please take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=302634 which reports failure with assertion failed: stmem.c:93: "current_offset == target_offset" and a dirty cache restart. The packages is plain 2.5.STABLE9 with these patches: squid-2.5.STABLE9-setcookie.patch squid-2.5.STABLE9-ftp_EPLF.patch squid-2.5.STABLE9-ftp_base_href.patch squid-2.5.STABLE9-aufs.patch squid-2.5.STABLE9-aufs_shutdown.patch squid-2.5.STABLE9-2GB.patch There's also a small typo in the changelog for the 2GB patch. The actual option that enables largefiles support is --with-large-files instead of --enable-large-files Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26
signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
